Ben's essay: Intro - mentions ongoing debate, provides a position on each side of the argument. thought provoking.
1st paragraph - PCC is ineffective 'toothless tiger' - example needed
2nd paragraph - however PCC is mostly adhered to, freedom of speech is retained, active audience.
3rd paragraph - mention hypodermic needle to link press regulation to film regulation.
4th paragraph - introduces film industry and BBFC, child's play. Could provide another argument. Conclusion needed.
Jess' essay: Intro - starts with question. point for boths sides.
1st paragraph - PCC ineffective, Stephen Gately case study.
2nd paragraph - Official Secrets Act, in contrast is too strict. Hypodermic needle, so public believe anything they hear.
3rd paragraph - introduces the BBFC. they react to active audience. spiderman example.
4th paragraph - BBFC ineffective because no control over home viewing hence jamie bulger. conclusion
No comments:
Post a Comment